“…[T]o talk about adjuncts is to talk about the centerpiece
of higher education. Tenured faculty represent only 17 percent of
college instructors. Part-time adjuncts are now the majority of the
professoriate and its fastest-growing segment.
“From 1975 to 2011, the number of part-time adjuncts quadrupled. And the so-called
part-time designation is misleading because most of them are piecing together
teaching jobs at multiple institutions simultaneously. A 2014 congressional
report suggests that 89 percent of adjuncts work at more than one institution; 13
percent work at four or more. The need for several appointments becomes obvious
when we realize how little any one of them pays.
“In 2013, The Chronicle began collecting data on salary and benefits from
adjuncts across the country. An English-department adjunct at Berkeley, for
example, received $6,500 to teach a full-semester course. It’s easy to lose
sight of all the people struggling beneath the data points. $7,000 at Duke. $6,000
at Columbia. $5,950 at the University of Iowa.
“These are the high numbers. According to the 2014
congressional report, adjuncts’ median pay per course is $2,700. An annual report by the American Association of University
Professors indicated that last year ‘the average part-time faculty member
earned $16,718’ from a single employer.
“Other studies have similar findings. Thirty-one percent of
part-time faculty members live near or below the poverty line. Twenty-five
percent receive public assistance, like Medicaid or food stamps. One
English-department adjunct who responded to the survey said that she sold her
plasma on Tuesdays and Thursdays to pay for her daughter’s day care.
“Another woman stated that she taught four classes a year
for less than $10,000. She wrote, ‘I am currently pregnant with my first child.
… I will receive NO time off for the birth or recovery. It is necessary I
continue until the end of the semester in May in order to get paid, something I
drastically need. The only recourse I have is to revert to an online classroom
[…] and do work while in the hospital and upon my return home.’ Sixty-one
percent of adjunct faculty are women…
“The abysmal conditions of adjuncts are not the inevitable
byproducts of an economy with limited space for literature. They are
intentional. Universities rely upon a revolving door of new Ph.D.s who work
temporarily for unsustainable wages before giving up and being replaced by next
year’s surplus doctorates.
“Adjuncts now do most university teaching and grading at a
fraction of the price, so that the ladder faculty have the time and resources
to write. We take the love that young people have for literature and use it to
support the research of a tiny elite...
“All of this is to say that the profession of literary
criticism depends upon exploitation. Even this formulation is too soothingly
vague, so let us be more direct: If you are a tenured (or tenure-track) faculty
member teaching in a humanities department with Ph.D. candidates, you are both
the instrument and the direct beneficiary of exploitation. Your roles as
teacher, adviser, and committee member generate, cultivate, and exploit young
people’s devotion to literature.
“This is the great shame of our profession. We tell our
students to study literature because it will make them better human beings,
that in our classrooms they will learn empathy and wisdom, thoughtfulness and
understanding. And yet the institutions supporting literary criticism are
callous and morally incoherent…”
For the complete article, The Great Shame of Our
Profession, How the Humanities Survive on Exploitation by Kevin Birmingham,
click here.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.