Former President Donald Trump last Saturday said he would
encourage Russia to do “whatever the hell they want” to any NATO member country
that doesn’t meet spending guidelines on defense in a stunning admission he
would not abide by the collective-defense clause at the heart of the alliance
if reelected.
“NATO was busted until I came along,”
Trump said at a rally in Conway, South Carolina. “I said, ‘Everybody’s gonna
pay.’ They said, ‘Well, if we don’t pay, are you still going to protect us?’ I
said, ‘Absolutely not.’ They couldn’t believe the answer.”
Trump said “one of the presidents of a
big country” at one point asked him whether the US would still defend the
country if they were invaded by Russia even if they “don’t pay.”
“No, I would not protect you,” Trump
recalled telling that president. “In fact, I would encourage them to do
whatever the hell they want. You got to pay. You got to pay your bills.”
The White House later Saturday called
Trump’s remarks “appalling and unhinged” and touted President Joe Biden’s
efforts to bolster the alliance.
“President Biden has restored our
alliances and made us stronger in the world because he knows every commander in
chief’s first responsibility is to keep the American people safe and hold true
to the values that unite us. … Encouraging invasions of our closest allies by
murderous regimes is appalling and unhinged – and it endangers American
national security, global stability, and our economy at home,” White House
spokesperson Andrew Bates said in a statement.
NATO Secretary General Jens
Stoltenberg said Sunday that Trump’s comments about the alliance put European
and American soldiers at risk.
“Any attack on NATO will be met with a
united and forceful response,” Stoltenberg said in a statement. “Any suggestion
that allies will not defend each other undermines all of our security,
including that of the US, and puts American and European soldiers at increased
risk.”
European Council President Charles
Michel on Sunday described comments from Trump on NATO “reckless,” adding they
“serve only Putin’s interest.”
“Reckless statements on NATO’s
security and Art 5 solidarity serve only Putin’s interest. They do not bring
more security or peace to the world,” Michel said in a post on X. “The
Transatlantic Alliance has underpinned the security and the prosperity of Americans,
Canadians and Europeans for 75 years.”
At the core of the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization and enshrined in Article 5 of the treaty is the promise of
collective defense — that an attack on one member nation is an attack on all
the nations in the alliance. Trump has long complained about the amount other
countries in NATO spend on defense compared with the United States and has
repeatedly threatened to withdraw the US from NATO. But his comments Saturday
are his most direct indication he does not intend to defend NATO allies from
Russian attack if he is reelected.
Trump has for years inaccurately
described how NATO funding works. NATO has a target that each member
country spends a minimum of 2% of gross domestic product on defense, and most
countries are not meeting that target. But the figure is a guideline and
not a binding contract, nor does it create “bills”; member countries haven’t
been failing to pay their share of NATO’s common budget to run the
organization.
Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, who has
endorsed Trump, said Sunday he had “zero concerns” about the former president’s
NATO comments.
Rubio told CNN’s Jake Tapper on “State
of the Union” that Trump was merely reflecting on an anecdote from his
presidency, arguing member nations weren’t “paying their dues” until Trump
“used leverage” to push NATO countries to “step up to the plate.”
“Trump’s just the first one to express
it in these terms,” the Florida Republican said.
As president, Trump privately
threatened multiple times to withdraw the United States
from NATO, according to The New York Times. Trump
has described NATO as “obsolete” and has aligned himself with Russian President
Vladimir Putin, who wants to weaken the alliance. Trump has long praised Putin
and went as far as to side with the Russian leader over the US
intelligence community over Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential
election.
This story has been updated with
additional developments.
CNN’s Kaanita Iyer, Daniel Dale, Marshall Cohen,
Veronica Stracqualursi, Jim Acosta, Kevin Liptak and Martin
Goillandeau contributed to this report.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.