First came the classroom culture wars. Now, the backlash.
Conservative activists pushing for
parents to have more of a say in what their children are taught in school
suffered a series of high-profile losses in Tuesday’s election, dealing a major
blow to a movement that has advocated for book bans and
restrictions on classroom discussion about issues of gender and race.
Voters in multiple states rejected
local school board candidates backed by groups such as Moms for Liberty,
choosing moderate or liberal candidates instead.
Just over a third of the candidates
endorsed by Moms for Liberty won their races on Tuesday. The Florida-based
nonprofit, which has been at the center of many of the battlers over school
curricula, said 50 of the 139 school board candidates it endorsed were elected.
The group’s track record for the entire year is only slightly better. Overall,
the group said 44% of the candidates it has backed this year won their races.
Tiffany Justice, one of the Moms for
Liberty founders, said she feels good about the election results even though
the candidates backed by the group lost far more races than they won.
Pointing to the candidates who did
win, Justice said, “That means you have 50 liberty-minded individuals that are
going to go serve on school boards, that are going to put the focus back on the
basics in school, and they’re going to make sure that parental rights are
respected.”
Another group, the 1776 Project, said
58% of the candidates it endorsed – many of them in conservative areas – won.
“Considering the national environment, we view that as a strong result,” said
Ryan Girdusky, the group’s founder.
Since the runup to last year's midterm elections,
the GOP has sought to strengthen its grip on local elections by targeting
school board races across the country. New right-leaning political action committees began pouring
money into school board races in the last cycle – a trend that continued into
2023 and is expected in 2024 – aiming to not only flip control of who governs
schools but change education on a national scale.
But teachers’ unions, education
activists and others portrayed the less-than-stellar showing by Moms for
Liberty and other like-minded groups on Tuesday as a repudiation of their
far-right agenda.
“These results underline what families
have been telling us for the last two years: They don’t want culture wars. They
want safe and welcoming public schools where their kids can recover and
thrive,” said Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of
Teachers.
Jon Valant, an expert on education
policy, predicted the outcome of this year’s races could influence future
elections as well.
“It’s going to cause school board
candidates down the road to seriously question whether affiliating themselves
with some of these far-right groups is good for their chances of getting
elected,” said Valant, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, a
Washington-based think tank.
“I think a lot of them are going to come to the conclusion that it is not and that there’s too much risk that comes with associating with these groups,” Valant said.
Have voters had enough of the culture wars?
Local school boards in Ohio have become a battleground for the culture
wars raging in schools. But voters signaled on Tuesday they’ve had
enough.
In Stark County, which is in eastern Ohio, just one of nine
candidates backed by Moms for Liberty was elected. The single successful
candidate was an incumbent.
In
the Cincinnati area, two of eight candidates endorsed by Moms for
Liberty won. Two others backed by a group called Ohio Value Voters also were
elected. Ohio Value Voters controls a coalition that collects evidence from
mostly anonymous tipsters that Ohio schools are indoctrinating children on critical
race theory, comprehensive sex education and social and emotional
learning.
In the Columbus area, several conservatives ran on culture war
promises, including keeping transgender girls off girls’ sports teams,
protecting parents’ rights, limiting diversity and inclusion efforts and
curtailing sex education. Eight out of 10 of them lost.
Most of the candidates who campaigned on hot-button issues lost because “by and large voters aren’t looking for extremist candidates,” said Scott DiMauro, president of the Ohio Education Association.
Iowa voters delivered a near clean sweep for progressive school
board candidates in the suburbs of Des Moines and in other high-profile races
around the state. Advocacy groups across the political spectrum and local
elected officials from both parties weighed in this year on Des Moines'
suburban school board elections, which are nonpartisan but have taken a heated
political turn in recent years.
Only one of the Iowa candidates formally endorsed by Moms for
Liberty won a school board seat. Voters also rejected a slate of four
candidates endorsed by The Family Leader, an influential Christian conservative
group led by Bob Vander Plaats. Nearly all candidates promoted by local
Republican elected officials also came up short in the Des Moines suburbs.
Jenn Turner, chair of the Moms For Liberty Polk County Chapter,
said recent Iowa laws impacting education made parents more comfortable with
what is happening inside schools. Some of them stayed on this sidelines this
election, she said.
"Students use bathrooms and locker rooms based on their
biological sex. Boys cannot play in girls sports," Turner said. “And
sexually explicit books were removed from classrooms and school libraries
across the state, and gender identity cannot be taught in K-6 classrooms."
"Our opponents did a good job in misinformation campaigns,
telling the public that ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’ and other classics were being
removed, when in fact, only books that had graphic depictions of sex acts or
books suggesting porn sites were removed," she said.
Elsewhere, Democrats won five seats and seized control of the
school board from Republicans in the Central Bucks School District in
Pennsylvania by defeating candidates recommended by Moms for Liberty.
In Loudoun County, Virginia, which has faced the ire of conservative activists over its policies on transgender students, critical race theory and other issues, Democratic-endorsed candidates won or were leading in six of the nine school board races. Three of the four candidates backed by Moms for Liberty were defeated.
School boards and
the emergence of dark money groups
David Niven, a University of Cincinnati political scientist,
said Tuesday’s elections mark the end of “the stealth school board candidate.”
The emergence of “dark money” groups, which don’t disclose their
donors, and the involvement of political action committees and advocacy groups
helping culture warriors win in school board races has changed how the races
are run, Niven said.
“What we’ve seen in the past in Ohio is folks with pretty
far-out-there views could run without that much scrutiny and, sort of a victim
of their own success, they have these formal and organized efforts and adjacent
efforts helping to know just who is who,” he said.
Before, “it was a lot easier to present yourself as a concerned parent or concerned taxpayer or civic minded and not ever be confronted with ‘Do you want to ban books?’ Or, ‘You want to alter the curriculum or inject police into the schools?’” Niven said. “And now the effort is so much more brazen that it’s kind of a double-edged sword. They’re working harder to do this, but they’re almost at cross purposes with themselves.”
Justice, of Moms for Liberty, said her
group is looking to expand its influence by getting involved in state Board of
Education elections. Eighty-three percent of the candidates the group backed in
November’s elections were first-time candidates, she said. With 50 winning,
that means the group has helped 365 people get elected over the past two years.
“The bottom line is this: We are
helping a whole new group of people get involved in the civic process and to
come and try to reclaim or reform public education,” she said. “Teachers unions
have had a lock on school board elections for years. We’re the new kid on the
block.”
Valant, however, said the election
results could be a sign that voters are losing the appetite for turning school
issues into extreme partisan battles.
“These cultural war battles have been
a real distraction for last couple of years and, I think, have caused some real
harm in schools,” he said. “My hope is that a definite consequence of this is
that we’re going to see school board members thinking harder about the
trade-offs that come from affiliating with some of these groups.”
Valant said he also hopes the election
signals the country is on track to “turning down the temperature a bit” on the
culture wars.
by Michael Collins and Laura A. Bischoff, USA TODAY Contributing: Zachary Schermele, Chris Higgins, Samantha Hernandez and The Associated Press
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: School board election results offer rebuke of local culture warriors
School fight: Culture wars have taken hold of school board elections. Students say their well-being is at risk.
In the classroom: Despite political pressure, US teachers lead complex history lessons on race and slavery
Battle against inclusivity: 'Parents' rights' groups labeled extremist: SPLC lists a key Florida group as anti-government
Turning back the clock: Will fights over curriculum usher in new era of segregated schools?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.