Saturday, April 29, 2023

The Presidential Campaign of Convict 9653

 


On April 4, 2023, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg announced the indictment of former president and current presidential candidate Donald Trump on 34 felony charges related to alleged crimes involving bookkeeping on a 7-year-old hush money payment to an adult film actress.

Trump is unlikely to wind up in an orange jumpsuit, at least not on this indictment, and probably not before November 2024, in any case. Yet if he does, he would not be the first candidate to run for the White House from the Big House.

In the election of 1920, Eugene V. Debs, the Socialist Party presidential candidate, polled nearly a million votes without ever hitting the campaign trail. Debs was behind bars in the federal penitentiary in Atlanta, Georgia, serving a 10-year sentence for sedition. It was a not a bum rap. Debs had defiantly disobeyed a law he deemed unjust, the Sedition Act of 1918.

The act was an anti-free speech measure passed at the behest of President Woodrow Wilson. The law made it illegal for a U.S. citizen to “willfully utter, print, write, or publish any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the United States government” or to discourage compliance with the draft or voluntary enlistment into the military.

By the time he was imprisoned for sedition, Eugene Victor Debs had enjoyed a lifetime of running afoul of government authority. Born in 1855 into bourgeois comfort in Terre Haute, Indiana, he worked as a clerk and a grocer before joining the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen in 1875 and finding his vocation as an advocate for labor.

Eugene Debs ran for president five times, including in 1904, when he wrote this column for The Spokane Press. Library of Congress

Representing American Socialism

For the next 30 years, Debs was the face of socialism in America. He ran for president four times, in 1900, 1904, 1908 and 1912, garnering around a million votes in the last cycle. “The Republican, Democratic, and Progressive Parties are but branches of the same capitalistic tree,” he told a cheering mass of people in Madison Square Garden during the 1912 campaign. “They all stand for wage slavery.”

In 1916, he opted to seek a seat in Congress and deferred to socialist journalist Allan L. Benson to head the party’s ticket. Both lost.

In April 1917, when America joined World War I’s bloodbath in Europe, Debs became a fierce opponent of American involvement in what he saw as a death cult orchestrated by rapacious munitions manufacturers. On May 21, 1918, wary of a small but energized and eloquent anti-war movement, Wilson signed the Sedition Act into law.

Debs would not be muzzled. One June 18, 1918, in an address in Canton, Ohio, he declared that American boys were “fit for something better than for cannon fodder.”

In short order, he was arrested and convicted of violating the Sedition Act. At his sentencing, he told the judge he would not retract a word of his speech even if it meant he would spend the rest of his life behind bars. “I ask for no mercy, plead for no immunity,” he declared. After a brief stint in the West Virginia Federal Penitentiary, he was sent to serve out his sentence at the Atlanta Federal Penitentiary.

Last-minute pre-election campaigning on Debs’ behalf by the Socialist Party is described in the New York Tribune of October 27, 1920. Library of Congress

Imprisonment only enhanced Debs’ status with his followers. On May 13, 1920, at its national convention in New York, the Socialist Party unanimously nominated “Convict 2253” as its standard bearer for the presidency. Debs was later given new digits, so the campaign buttons read “For President, Convict No. 9653.”

As Debs’ name was entered into nomination, a wave of emotion swept over the delegates, who cheered for 30 minutes before bursting into a rousing chorus of the “Internationale,” the communist anthem.

A ‘front cell’ campaign

Debs’ opponents both were better funded and enjoyed freedom of movement: They were Warren G. Harding, the GOP junior senator from Ohio, and James M. Cox, governor of Ohio, for the Democrats.

Yet Debs did not let incarceration keep his message from the voters. In a wry response to Harding’s “front porch” campaign style, in which the Republican candidate received visits from the front porch of his home in Marion, Ohio, the Socialist Party announced that its candidate would conduct a “front cell” campaign from Atlanta.

In 1920, broadcast radio was not a factor in electioneering, but another electronic medium was just beginning to be exploited for political messaging. On May 29, 1920, in a carefully choreographed event, newsreel cameras filmed a delegation from the Socialist Party arriving at the Atlanta penitentiary to inform Debs officially of his nomination. The intertitles of the silent screen described “the most unusual scene in the political history of America – Debs, serving a ten-year term for ‘seditious activities,’ accepts Socialist nomination for Presidency.”

After accepting “a floral tribute from Socialist women voters,” the “Moving Picture Weekly” reported, the denim-clad Debs was shown giving “a final affectionate farewell” before heading “back to the prison cell for nine years longer.”

At motion picture theaters across the nation, audiences watched the staged ritual and, depending on their party registration, reacted with cheers or hisses.

The New York Times was aghast that a felon might canvass for votes from the motion picture screen. “Under the influence of this unreasoning mob psychology, the acknowledged criminal is nightly applauded as loudly as many of the candidates for the Presidency who have won their honorable eminence by great and unflagging service to the American people,” read an editorial from June 12, 1920.

One year after the election of 1920, President Harding commuted Debs’ sentence and he was released from prison on Christmas Day, 1921. Library of Congress

Public opinion turns

On Nov. 2, 1920, when the election results came in, Harding had trounced his Democratic opponent by a record electoral majority, 404 electoral votes to Cox’s 127, with 60.4% of the popular vote to Cox’s 34.1%. Debs was a distant third, but he had won 3.4% of the electorate – 913,693 votes. Debs’ personal best showing was in the presidential election of 1912, with 6% of the vote. To be fair, that was when he was more mobile.

Even with the Great War over and the Sedition Act repealed by a repentant U.S. Congress on Dec. 13, 1920, President Wilson, during his final months in office, steadfastly refused to grant Debs a pardon. But public opinion had turned emphatically in favor of the convict-candidate. President Harding, who took office in March 1921, finally commuted his sentence, effective on Christmas Day, 1921, along with that of 23 other Great War prisoners of conscience convicted under the Sedition Act.

As Debs exited the prison gates, his fellow inmates cheered. He raised his hat in one hand, his cane in the other, and waved back at them. Outside, the newsreel cameras were waiting to greet him. It was the kind of photo op that Donald Trump might relish.The Conversation


Thomas Doherty, Professor of American Studies, Brandeis University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

 


Thursday, April 27, 2023

Poems by Glen Brown

 


Available at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and Kindle.

A Joy to Read:

Reviewed in the United States on January 15, 2024

Glen Brown’s humbling collection of personal poems, Hum If You Cannot Sing, is a joy to contemplate, again and again. His verses are a fun and flawless reminder of the riotous carnival of our lives: past and present. Bizarre historical oddities are often summoned in a surreal séance of the bygone and notorious quite off the spectrum(?) of human behaviors; not to mention, the life of a Chicago child growing and erupting into corporeal and mindful enlightenment; and constantly fresh reminders of who and what we all are in this parade of emotional souls. If you seek you’ll find yourself and all the others of us in this fun, dreamlike and image-perfect sideshow in a magical collection of verse. Enjoy! -John Dillon

Must-Read Poetry Collection:

Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2024

We should all take Glen Brown's advice and "hum if we can't sing" while breaking into song and dance "at every conflict in life." Wouldn't the world be a better place? This eclectic mix of poetry hooked me from the first page and took me through an amazing journey where Brown showcases his mastery and love of poetry. Metaphorical fairy and folk tales, hilarious interpretations of popular news stories of the weird, reflections of family, profound social commentary, memories of growing up in and around Chicago in the 1950's and 1960's are all included. I have read the book three times now, and I'll be sure to go back to it many more times in the future. -DJM

A compelling collection of vivid, insightful, and personal poetry

Reviewed in the United States on March 12, 2023

I've read many individual poems, but not many poetry collections. I read this one in a single sitting, which I rarely do with any book nowadays.

The imagery is vivid, well-crafted, and compelling. I found myself experiencing many glimpses of life moments both real and imagined. A childhood baseball game; a soldier in the jungle; couples engaged in heated arguments or conjugal bliss; a tragic death; a child playing in the snow. The broad range of people and experiences covered within and among these poems offers an insightful glimpse into the human condition. The tone ranges from serious to humorous, heartwarming to despairing, always with an eye to the humanity of the people and the poignant power of the experience.

This book also demonstrates the merits of a poetry collection. Taken individually, most of these poems would serve as excellent reads in their own right. However, including them in a shared collection creates space for the emergence of recurring themes and arcs that would be lacking when the poems are read individually. On a good day, a poetry collection is to poems what an album is to songs -- and this poetry collection is having a good day.

I definitely recommend this collection for anyone who enjoys reading and is currently experiencing the human condition. Whether or not you relate to the specific memories and experiences described therein, you will find poems and verses that speak to you. -Treesong (Justin O’Neill)

Full of insight and beauty

Reviewed in the United States on March 8, 2023

I don't know how many people buy books of poetry. I sure didn't for a long time. I was under the impression that poetry was a complex undertaking, full of strict rhyme schemes, esoteric culture and impenetrable philosophy. Turns out I was wrong- poetry can be the very opposite of all that. It can be simple, delightful, accessible and understandable. In Hum If You Can't Sing, Glen Brown shares with us a collection of poetry that is inviting and enjoyable but still rich with insight and clever turns of phrase.

The stories told here are both universal and deeply personal. They are full of fairytale heroes and modern scenes, with stories either large enough to fill a newspaper front page or otherwise small enough to fit into a quiet afternoon. Glen is a master of juxtaposition, creating the new from the familiar, mixing joy with sadness, frustration with humor, in equal measure. So read it, without reservation. There are no rules to the dance. Read if you can't write. Hum if you can't sing. -Nick Vovos

Delightful

Reviewed in the United States on March 5, 2023

I'm a retired high school English teacher and know of Glen through his pension writings. Intrigued by those, I purchased HUM IF YOU CAN'T SING. This will be a simplistic review because I can summarize in a few words: These poems are my life. Section III reminds me of my childhood - Royal Blue where we bought our penny candy, neighborhood baseball games, my pet squirrels, our unlocked house, my name. I, too, have an obsession for chocolate; I stash it in the garage refrigerator and hide it in my drawer. I enjoyed the connections to politicians, film, fashion, literature and toys in section I. I know all too well the questions, the pain, and the deaths that surround surgery.

"Without Pomp and Circumstance" echoes my exact feelings. But I have to admit my favorite is "Keeping a Net beneath Them." I taught composition and honors classes, but I also taught special ed/remedial classes. There was nothing I liked more than seeing the "I get it" look cross a student's face. That is what I miss most about teaching. I know this is a collection I will read many times as it is as personal to me as it is to Glen, and I thank him for that. -Robin Cederblad

A powerful collection of poems . . .

Reviewed in the United States on March 4, 2023

This collection of poems by Glen Brown is powerful. Brown took me through a life's joys and sorrows, with grace, skill, and irony. I like his style, casual and elegant at the same time. I flew from one poem to the next, unable to put down this book . . . and in an hour, Glen Brown had taken me on a wonderful journey. Each poem is a beautiful surprise. This is one of the best books of poems I've read in a long time. I recommend it to anyone with imagination and an open heart. -Bob Borta

Poetry that speaks to the human condition in an intellectually and emotionally playful manner

Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on March 17, 2023

Hum If You Can't Sing, is a great collection of poetry from a long-time friend, and former teacher, of mine. Since I purchased this book, it has not left my desk. I like to open it to a random page and to see what Glen has to say to me on that occasion. His sense of humor and social justice, as well as his awareness of history are played off against the sometimes-arbitrary nature of human existence. No matter where I turn in this treasure it gives me something I value. Hum let's me check in with my friend whenever I need it. -Al Rago

 Writing that touches you in body, heart and soul

Reviewed in the United States on March 22, 2023

From the title poem, through the landscape of Chicago through the years , to the metaphors of fairy tales, to his personal experiences, Glen Brown takes one on an inner journey with his poignant and beautiful poems. Glen covers so many ages and places and relationships throughout his book that there is something there to touch everyone. Growing up in Chicago, I had a deep appreciation for the references that touched my young adulthood there, but you don’t need to know them to connect with these poems. Yet, “Hum If You Can’t Sing” and “Birth of an Angel” are the most gorgeous among these. I can see myself dancing through “Hum,” and laying in the snow flapping my arms in “Birth of an Angel,” giving one body sensations of the words. This is when poetry touches me most deeply. Don’t miss this remarkable book of poems! -Jann, Signal Mtn. Tennessee

Pitch Perfect

Reviewed in the United States on March 22, 2023

Just as the title suggests, "Hum if You Can’t Sing" unconditionally invites the reader into poetry with no expectations or prerequisites. Glen Brown is a masterful wordsmith in this eclectic and engaging collection of work. He challenges societal constructs and teases conventional wisdom, captivating our curiosity and encouraging us to use our own voice, however out of tune. -Johnny Alletto

 Superb Book of Poetry

Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on March 15, 2023

“Prose – words in their best order; poetry – the best words in their best order.”
--Samuel Taylor Coleridge in 1827

The poetry of Glen Brown brings us the 2023 examples of this definition in his latest collection, Hum If You Can't Sing. The scope of his poetry ranges from well-articulated silliness to philosophical insights, all the while respecting a reader's intelligence. He never talks down to a reader; he never drowns a reader in obscurity. He chooses to be like the porridge that Goldilocks eats – just right. He writes of playing in the streets as a child, to revisiting Rapunzel, and of coming to terms with our ultimate end. Yes, simply read, alertly reread, and thoroughly savor his poetry. You will be amply rewarded for your journey. - Ken and Mary Lou Previti

Variety of Poems, All Well Written!

Reviewed in the United States on May 4, 2023

Whether you are an avid poetry reader, only occasional, or anywhere in between, Hum If You Can’t Sing was written for you. Some of the poems are playful, others much more serious, and all came to life as they brought me to another time or place. A wonderful book to pick up time and time again. -Bekah

A masterful poet.

Reviewed in the United States on February 28, 2023

Glen Brown's poems are a revelation. They are keen observations on the human condition. He writes of families and philosophy, unusual answers to surprising questions, Barbie dolls and baseball bats. There's just a lot packed into 100 pages. -Fred Klonsky

Witty, Personal and Thoughtful

Reviewed in the United States on March 2, 2023

This was written by my most influential teacher from High School. This was my initial reason to purchase the book. I am so glad I did; it is full of insightful and inspiring words. I highly recommend this book. -Karen Rice-Heidewald

Powerful and Thought provoking

Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on March 9, 2023

Powerful, sensitive, thought-provoking, delightful! Creativity at its best! HUM IF YOU CAN’T SING is a keeper! Thank you, Glen Brown! -Sharon Jakubka.

On Messenger:

Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on March 9, 2023

Got your book today. Preparing for an afternoon read. Thank You. I like the way you use “history” to set up your voice to follow. I’m a bitch with content. So I’m gonna disengage and enter with a clean slate to see where you take me… March 22: Been reading your work a coupla times… enjoy the plain story voice and the “headline setups” for the poems to follow… March 29: Glen/Poet: Clean lines that take us somewhere/ a triad of voices that blend into one. An enjoyable read of your history and those you admire or analyze. It’d be fun to do a duel reading… -Terry Jacobus

Plagiarize this book:

Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on January 11, 2024

You’ll sound witty to your friends and maybe win over the target of your affection. You’ll laugh reading these poems if you are the type. You’ll cry if you’re more that type. While many writers aspire to have a way with words, Brown has his way with them. He threads together relatable fibers of everyday life into a tapestry commemorative of the human experience. Remarkable work. -Jeff Price

Beautiful:

Reviewed in the United States on December 21, 2023

Glen Brown has written a beautiful collection of poems that are approachable, emotive, nostalgic and universal. His stories resonate with my own life experiences, and I felt for the narrator in several. Thank you Glen for sharing this gift with the world.-Mike Magluilo


Tuesday, April 25, 2023

Steven Wright


1. I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize.
2. Borrow money from pessimists—they don't expect it back.
3. Half the people you know are below average.
4. 99% of lawyers give the rest a bad name.
5. 82.7% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
6. A conscience is what hurts when all your other parts feel so good.
7. A clear conscience is usually the sign of a bad memory.
8. If you want the rainbow, you got to put up with the rain.
9. All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand.
10. The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.

11. I almost had a psychic girlfriend, but she left me before we met.
12. OK, so what's the speed of dark?
13. How do you tell when you're out of invisible ink?
14. If everything seems to be going well, you have obviously overlooked something.
15. Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm.
16. When everything is coming your way, you're in the wrong lane.
17. Ambition is a poor excuse for not having enough sense to be lazy.
18. Hard work pays off in the future; laziness pays off now.
19. I intend to live forever. So far, so good.
20. If Barbie is so popular, why do you have to buy her friends?

21. Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.
22. What happens if you get scared half to death twice?
23. My mechanic told me, "I couldn't repair your brakes, so I made your horn louder."
24. Why do psychics have to ask you for your name?
25. If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried.
26. A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking.
27. Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.
28. The hardness of the butter is proportional to the softness of the bread.
29. To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism; to steal from many is research.
30. The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard.

31. The sooner you fall behind, the more time you'll have to catch up.
32. The colder the x-ray table, the more of your body is required to be on it.
33. Everyone has a photographic memory; some just don't have film.
34. If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you.
35. I busted a mirror and got seven years bad luck, but my lawyer thinks he can get me five.
36. It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it.
37. Everywhere is within walking distance if you have the time.
38. I bought some instant water one time but I didn't know what to add to it.
39. If you are in a spaceship that is traveling at the speed of light, and you turn on the headlights, does anything happen?
 
 

Wednesday, April 19, 2023

No Amount of Money Erases What We Already Learned About Fox in the Dominion Case

 


Dominion Voting Systems and Fox Corporation may have settled their lawsuit out of court, but nothing Fox does will erase what we’ve learned about it along the way.

After a months-long legal battle, Dominion and Fox settled for $787.5 million, in what was originally a $1.6 billion defamation suit. The decision was anticlimactic at best, as people had geared up for an unprecedented trial process.

Technically, per the American Bar Association, “a settlement doesn’t usually state that anyone was right or wrong in the case.” So even though Fox paid up, they aren’t officially admitting wrongdoing. But as Senator Mitt Romney told HuffPost reporter Igor Bobic, “Clearly you don’t agree to pay someone three quarters of a billion dollars unless you think there’s a real risk you’re going to lose.

And all that money won’t take back what Dominion has already revealed about Fox. Court documents show that Fox News hosts and executives never believed the conspiracy theories about the 2020 election that they were spreading.

Text messages and deposition excerpts show that hosts including Tucker Carlson and Laura Ingraham knew the election conspiracies were false and that Donald Trump’s lawyers weren’t credible, but they spread the conspiracies and invited the lawyers on air anyway. Carlson, who has repeatedly fawned over Trump on his show, even texted someone he was looking forward to ignoring Trump. “I hate him passionately,” Carlson said of the former president.

Fox owner Rupert Murdoch admitted under oath that he knew his media organization was spreading lies, but he continued to let hosts spout falsehoods and have Trump team members on as guests. A Fox News producer sued the company, alleging executives let the lies stand because they were good for business and coerced her into giving misleading testimony in the Dominion lawsuit.

But in a statement released after the decision was made to settle, Fox said they “acknowledge the Court’s rulings finding certain claims about Dominion to be false.” Fox only admitted that some of the things they said about Dominion were false, but recall that the court already ruled that everything they said about Dominion was false.

“The evidence developed in this civil proceeding demonstrates that [it] is CRYSTAL clear that none of the Statements relating to Dominion about the 2020 election are true,” a judge wrote in a decision last month, allowing the case to proceed to trial.

Fox, for its part, has made no mention of making an on-air retraction or apology about the Dominion falsehoods. “Fox is about to burn brighter and hotter,” warned Media Matters president Angelo Carusone.

“Fox didn’t just get away with murder; they basically got a license to kill,” he said. “Unless we cut off their inflated guaranteed revenue from their wildly overpriced cable carriage fees, Fox is gonna use the license.”  

-Tori Otten, The New Republic

 


Saturday, April 15, 2023

The Time Thief Who Stole 106 Rare Clocks in a Daring Heist

 


Forty years ago, on a spring night in April 1983, a thief bypassed security at the L.A. Mayer Museum for Islamic Art in Jerusalem, entering the building under the cover of darkness. The burglar stole 106 rare clocks worth tens of millions of dollars, then vanished without a trace.

The crime had all the elements of a high-stakes drama: a mysterious theft, befuddled investigators, a romance that spanned decades and outlasted a prison sentence, and two bequeathments of valuable timepieces (among them a pocket watch commissioned for Marie Antoinette).

In the two decades following the theft, authorities made little progress on the investigation. The heist seemed like a mystery that would never be solved—until a deathbed confession by a career criminal led to the recovery of almost all of the missing timepieces.

Roughly the same size as New Jersey, Israel has more museums per capita than any other country in the world. The Israel MuseumBible Lands and the Museum of the Jewish People are three of the country’s most prominent cultural institutions. But Israel also houses hundreds of smaller specialized museums: a museum of taxation, a museum of Circassian culture, a museum commemorating a clandestine ammunition factory built in 1945, a museum featuring famous figures sculpted in edible marzipan, a museum of mechanical music and even a museum dedicated to paddleball.

Amid this tapestry of Israeli museums is the Museum for Islamic Art, which opened in 1974. It boasts a collection of some 4,000 objects, including jewelry, pottery, rugs, weapons and Qurans, and it welcomes tens of thousands of visitors annually.

Perhaps the most unique feature of a museum otherwise dedicated to Islamic art is its collection of rare and valuable watches. The story of how this treasure trove—one of the “three rarest clock collections in the world,” according to the museum—came together is key to understanding both why it was targeted and how its prized contents were eventually returned.

Vera Frances Bryce Salomons—a British Jewish aristocrat, nurse and philanthropist, as well as a grandniece of the first Jewish lord mayor of London—founded the museum in the 1960s in hopes of fostering mutual understanding between Jews and Arabs. An early benefactor of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, she’d studied under Leo Aryeh Mayer, then-head of the university’s Islamic art department (and the future namesake of the museum). Mayer’s personal collection formed the core of the museum’s initial holdings.

After making some additions to the nascent collection herself, Salomons entrusted acquisitions to Richard Ettinghausen, a historian of Islamic art who served as chief curator at the Smithsonian’s Freer Gallery.

Construction of the museum started in 1965. Salomons, who died in 1969 at age 81, didn’t live to see its completion. But her vision guided its design: In addition to six permanent galleries dedicated to Islamic art and changing exhibitions of contemporary art, Salomons showcased a collection of some 200 clocks inherited from her father, David Lionel Salomons. The cache—which has no connections to Islamic art—features pendulum clocks, self-winding clocks, decorative watches, grandfather clocks and other rare specimens.

Highlights of the collection included 55 clocks crafted by famed horologist Abraham-Louis Breguet, among them a calendar- and thermometer-equipped watch made for Napoleon Bonaparte’s sister. Known as the father of modern watchmaking, Breguet is credited with an array of innovations, among them the tourbillon, an addition to watch mechanisms that counteracts the pull of gravity and makes timekeeping more accurate.

Breguet was also the mastermind behind the gem of Salomons’ collection: a clock commissioned for Marie Antoinette, supposedly by a guard who’d fallen in love with the doomed French queen. The object was so mechanically complex that it was only completed in 1827, 34 years after Marie Antoinette’s execution in 1793 and 4 years after Breguet’s own death. Valued at $30 million, the clock comprises 823 parts made of gold, platinum and sapphires.


Staff realized the museum had been burglarized after arriving for work the morning of April 17, 1983. As Rachel Hasson, then the artistic director of the museum, told the Telegraph in 2009, “It was shocking. On the floor were the glass panels and the locks of the showcases. Everywhere lay remnants of packing materials, tape and cardboard; there were empty Coca-Cola bottles, cables and wires.”

The 106 stolen timepieces included the Marie Antoinette clock, a pistol-shaped 19th-century clock and a “Sympathique” clock designed by Breguet. Though the museum’s watch collection was insured for $700,000, its actual value was significantly higher. In addition to the clocks, the thief took several paintings and other artifacts.

The police were mystified. Two guards had been monitoring the museum the night of the theft, but they claimed to have been asleep during the break-in. The museum’s alarm system was reportedly broken. “The concept of using advanced security measures to secure artwork in Israel was still in its infancy at the time,” Jenya Frumin, a senior tour guide at the museum, told the Jerusalem Post last year.

The sheer number of items stolen suggested multiple thieves were involved. But the window seemingly used to enter the building was on the smaller side, barely large enough to admit a grown adult. Authorities offered a $2 million reward for the return of the stolen clocks. But local police, Interpol, private detectives and even Mossad (Israel’s national intelligence agency) all searched in vain.

“Over the years, we received anonymous calls and heard many rumors that the watches had been found, but they all amounted to nothing,” Hasson told the Financial Times in 2009. “Eventually our search was reduced to looking through … auction catalogs to see if pieces were appearing in sales. It was very painful for me, but at some point, I thought it was a lost cause.”

For the next 25 years, the museum cases that had held the watches stood empty, a testament to the unsolved burglary. In 2004, a notorious Israeli criminal named Naaman Diller (also known as Naaman Lidor) died of cancer.

Two years later, in August 2006, a Tel Aviv arts dealer informed museum staff that he’d been asked to perform a valuation of clocks he recognized as part of the Salomons collection. A few days later, Hasson received a phone call from a lawyer representing an anonymous woman who claimed to possess 39 of the stolen clocks, including the Marie Antoinette watch. She would return them to the museum—for a price—but she wanted anonymity and no police involvement.

After negotiating with the lawyer, the museum agreed to pay $35,000 for the timepieces’ safe return. The deal stayed under wraps for more than a year, but in November 2007, news of the clocks’ reemergence surfaced in the Israeli media. Authorities started investigating, examining the recovered clocks and interrogating the lawyer who’d negotiated the sale. Eventually, the trail of clues led detectives to Los Angeles, where they identified the woman who’d returned the clocks as Israeli expatriate Nili Shamrat.

Shamrat was Diller’s widow. Her husband had apparently confessed to the heist on his deathbed and left the stolen goods to her in his will.

Israeli police were already familiar with Diller. A “master forger and resourceful thief” who was “renowned for his ability to crawl into tight spaces,” according to Pete Stegemeyer’s book Heist, he was best known for a 1967 bank robbery in Tel Aviv. Diller spent five months digging an underground tunnel to the bank, where he carefully cracked open safe-deposit boxes and stole the most valuable loot.

Even the detectives tasked with taking Diller down expressed grudging admiration for him. “He was a legendary robber. He was very different, very intelligent, and had a unique style,” Oded Yaniv, one of the investigators who broke the clock case, told the Associated Press in 2008. “We are all disappointed that we don’t have the chance to sit and talk to him and investigate him. We feel like we missed out on that.”

Authorities had considered Diller an initial suspect in the museum heist, but they eliminated him because his passport showed he was out of the country at the time of the heist. Investigators later found out that Diller fabricated this alibi, forging the necessary documentation to avoid detection.

Later, police pieced together how the infamous robber had probably masterminded the heist. They believe Diller cased the museum ahead of time, noting the broken alarm and where the security guards were situated. He used a tool to bend the bars on a back window, then crawled into the building with the help of a rope ladder. Masking his movements by parking his car in front of the window, he removed the timepieces that were small enough to fit through the window and dismantled some of the larger items.

According to police and her own testimony, Shamrat didn’t know about Diller’s involvement in the theft until much later. The pair met in Tel Aviv in 1970 and dated until Diller was sent to prison in 1972, around the same time that Shamrat relocated to Los Angeles. The couple reconnected in the late 1980s and wed in 2003, a year before Diller’s death.

When detectives executed a search warrant at Shamrat’s home in the Tarzana neighborhood of Los Angeles in May 2008, they found contraband clocks, three 18th-century oil paintings and an antique Latin manuscript, all of which had been stolen from the museum. They also found display placards from a museum exhibition.

The Tarzana search led police to safety deposit boxes around the world. Diller had sold just 3 of the 106 stolen clocks, stashing the rest everywhere from Tel Aviv to Munich to Basel to Paris to Los Angeles.

“Luckily for us, Diller was so passionate about the watches that he kept each of the tiny pieces in perfect condition,” Hasson told the Financial Times in 2009. “We found meticulous notes Diller wrote about each component and mechanism … on scraps of paper, toilet paper and old boxes. He could have broken down the less recognizable parts of the watches to sell them, but he never did.”

Authorities eventually found 96 of the 106 stolen timepieces. (The fate of the other clocks remains unknown.) In July 2009, the recovered items went back on view at the museum—this time in a supposedly theft-proof walk-in safe.

In March 2010, Shamrat, who’d been convicted of receiving stolen property by a California court, was sentenced to five years of probation and 300 hours of community service. She lost her job as a teacher at a Jewish high school as a result of the scandal but maintained that she’d only learned of her husband’s crimes when he confessed to them on his deathbed.

Unable to question Diller, authorities can only speculate what motivated him to burgle the museum. “We believe that he didn’t carry out the theft for the money but instead for the thrill of it,” Yaniv told the Jerusalem Post last year. “He yearned to succeed in doing the impossible, to achieve an incredible feat. … He loved clocks, and he also loved carrying out heists.”  

-Fern Reiss, Smithsonian Magazine