“An
Alzheimer’s test that gauges a person’s ability to detect and recall specific
odors may soon be available in doctor’s offices, two new studies suggest. A low
cost ‘sniff’ test could make Alzheimer’s easier to diagnose at its earliest
stages, when treatments may be most effective.
“Alzheimer’s
affects parts of the brain critical for recognizing odors, and the ability to
detect specific odors may precede memory loss and other symptoms of the
disease. A number of scent tests have been developed to test odor perception as
a way to diagnose early Alzheimer’s.
“‘There
is increasing evidence that Alzheimer’s disease starts at least 10 years before
the onset of memory symptoms,’ said Dr. Mark Albers, the principal investigator
of one of the studies, from Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. ‘The
development of an affordable, accessible and noninvasive means to identify
healthy individuals who are at risk is a critical step to developing therapies
that slow down or halt Alzheimer’s disease progression.’
“In
the study, published in the Annals of Neurology, the Boston researchers tested
183 visitors to the hospital’s memory clinic on their ability to identify and
compare various scents. Ten of them had been diagnosed with Alzheimer’s, and 29
with mild cognitive impairment, a symptomatic stage that often precedes the
disease. The remainder either had no memory problems or had general complaints
about their memories.
“In
one part of the testing, study participants were exposed for two seconds each
to 10 different smells: menthol, clove, leather, strawberry, lilac, pineapple,
smoke, soap, grape or lemon. After each, they were asked to choose from a list
of four scents for the one that best describes the odor.
“In
another part of the testing, they were exposed to 10 additional odors: banana,
garlic, cherry, baby powder, grass, fruit punch, peach, chocolate, dirt and
orange. They were asked to identify each, and also if the smell had been
included in the earlier test. Participants were also presented with two
consecutive odors and asked whether they were different or the same.
“Through
these and other scent tests, the researchers were able to identify correctly
which of the participants had been given a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s or mild
cognitive impairment, and which had memories in the normal range.
“The
researchers plan additional results to confirm the findings. ‘It is well
recognized that early diagnosis and intervention are likely to produce the most
effective therapeutic strategy for Alzheimer’s disease — preventing the onset or
the progression of symptoms,’ Dr. Albers said. ‘If these results hold up, this
sort of inexpensive, noninvasive screening could help us identify the best
candidates for novel therapies to prevent the development of symptoms of this
tragic disease.’
“The
second study came from the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of
Pennsylvania, which has developed a commonly used sniff test for Alzheimer’s.
For the study, in the Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, researchers gave 728
older men and women the Sniffin’ Sticks Odor Identification Test, which
requires people to identify 16 different smells. The participants also
underwent a comprehensive assessment of memory and thinking skills.
“All
the study participants had been previously undergone extensive evaluations by
Alzheimer’s doctors at the medical center and grouped into diagnostic
categories: ‘healthy older adult,’ ‘mild cognitive impairment’ or ‘Alzheimer’s.’
“Combined,
the sniff test and the memory and thinking exam were very accurate in
predicting who likely had Alzheimer’s, who had mild cognitive impairment and
who was cognitively healthy. For example, the memory test correctly identified
75 percent of those with mild cognitive impairment. But that figure rose to 87
percent when the results of the sniff test were added.
“‘There’s
the exciting possibility here that a decline in the sense of smell can be used
to identify people at risk years before they develop dementia,’ said the
study’s principal investigator, David R. Roalf, an assistant professor in Penn’s
department of psychiatry. ‘These results suggest that a simple odor
identification test can be a useful supplementary tool for clinically
categorizing mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s, and even for
identifying people who are at the highest risk of worsening.’
“Some
Alzheimer’s clinics are already employing sniff tests to assess people for
Alzheimer’s disease. They typically take 5 to 10 minutes or longer to
administer, though researchers are developing shorter tests that may take only
3 minutes or so that would be easier to give. As studies show they may be
effective in helping to diagnose serious memory problems, they may be used more
widely in the coming years, the researchers say.
“It’s
important to note that a poor sense of smell does not mean you will get
Alzheimer’s. An impaired sense of smell can be caused by many conditions other
than Alzheimer’s, including normal aging, medications, viral illnesses, head
injuries or nasal conditions. In addition, many people with Alzheimer’s retain
their sense of smell, so a sniff test is by no means foolproof.
“But
earlier detection of Alzheimer’s may allow for treatments that may be more
effective in curbing the progression of the disease. An inexpensive sniff test
might also prove to be useful as a preliminary test for identifying patients
who might need more extensive testing with brain scans, the researchers say.
“By ALZinfo.org, The
Alzheimer’s Information Site. Reviewed by Marc Flajolet, Ph.D., Fisher Center
for Alzheimer’s Research Foundation at The Rockefeller University.
Sources:
Dhilla
Albers A, Asafu-Adjei J, Delaney MK, et al: Episodic memory of odors stratifies
Alzheimer biomarkers in normal elderly. Annals of Neurology, Dec. 2016
Quarmley
M, Moberg PJ, Mechanic-Hamilton D, et al: Odor Identification Screening
Improves Diagnostic Classification in Incipient Alzheimer’s Disease. Journal of
Alzheimer’s Disease, published online Nov. 18, 2016
Thanks. This is not a topic many people wish to discuss or even share with others.
ReplyDeleteI have three buddies diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease. One seems as normal as normal can be but has what seems like panic attacks. His wife tells us how he masks his memory loss with nods and smiles as he changes subjects when he talks. She has described his occasional anger issues that surface on an irregular basis. They sold their home here in Florida and are moving to California. They lived there most of their lives and feel that there are more public and private resources for dealing with him and his Alzheimer's. I hope they are correct.
The second man gets lost in his car on a regular basis. He is an adjunct teacher at what used to be a junior college and is now a 4 year college. He teaches three three hour courses and "fills in" for absent teachers of many subjects several times a week. He uses his hearing loss as an excuse for responding illogically to students' comments and questions. His behavior is confused at times, but he has a warm and ready smile and deprecatory tone as he speaks laughingly.
The third man is presently living in an assisted living home with a 24 hour nurse and three other patients. He has a form of Parkinson's disease with Lewy Body Dementia which had been diagnosed originally as Alzheimer's disease. He is the husband of a friend of my wife; I visit him about once a week. He is strapped into his wheelchair because of his constant motion and sleeps in an adult crib. His speech is now extremely slurred, but he is physically very strong.
Why am I telling you these stories and the broad range of differences each is undergoing?
In addition to the insanity of healthcare cuts and non-declared price inflation, people our age have these widely varied symptoms of Alzheimer's and related diseases occurring, not to mention cancer. The money being made by those who invest in care and treatment is immense. Unfortunately, I believe, causes and cures are at the bottom of the list for medical research. The money is in care and treatment. As long as America continues its deregulation of everything and the reclassification of public services and regulated care facilities, the future seems bleak.
As much as I admire those who do research on diagnosis, and I do admire and appreciate this, I cannot see real possibility for progress in research and development regarding causes and cures for Alzheimer's. I believe that if polio was a problem today, polio clinics, treatment centers and polio hospices would be major financial investment gold mines. "Find the cure" has become a bumper sticker slogan for many diseases rather than an actual research and development goal.
We are living in dangerous times.
Thanks to both of you. Very frustrating time for health. I am particularly angry that cancer research isn't further along of course. I do think that there's too much money wound up in meds and treatment so very little done in research. Of course, it would help if all our money didn't go to wars and that we had true socialized medicine.
ReplyDelete