In the almost obsessive war on state
employees, retirees, and their retirement benefits, the governor and many
legislators blame unsustainable, excessive, retirement benefits for the
unfunded liability of the pension systems by bashing the only group that
faithfully paid their share of retirement contributions. At the same time, they
virtually ignore or excuse the administrations and legislatures that
underfunded the retirement systems, using those monies to fund favored programs
or projects.
The favorite target of the governor, and many legislators,
is the annual 3% increase in pension benefits, commonly called the COLA. Their
argument is that this 3% actually exceeds the current annual consumer price
index, or CPI. Strange, but we never heard that argument in the years of 1979
through 1981, when the CPI increased by 35.1%, while retiree benefits increased
by little more than 9%. In other words, the purchasing power of the average
retiree was reduced by about 26%.
And that brings up the plight of those that we will call “Tier
0” retirees, those who retired before January of 1998 under a retirement system
that was rated 49th in the nation for retirement benefits. In 1998, the
retirement formula was changed, giving someone who retired after that date with
20 years of service about 50% more in retirement benefits than the pre-1998
retiree. Unfortunately, no provision was ever made to adjust the benefits of
the pre-1998 retiree, or the “Tier 0” retiree.
So, even today, there are still many retirees out there who
retired under the old formula, retirees who saw their nation's worst pension
system benefits reduced by 26% in just three years. For the “Tier 0” retiree, a
reduction in COLA would be a double whammy, a lesser annual increase on their
already lesser benefits. We bring this up, not in the hope of improving the
benefits of these “Tier 0” retirees, but to remind legislators that there are
many less-than-obvious problems associated with addressing the unfunded pension
liability problem. A quick fix, knee jerk, one-size-fits-all solution could
very well result in real hardship for many retirees.
NOTE: Legislative Reports are from contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views or the policies of the Retired
State Employees Association
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.