Wednesday, January 7, 2026

"A lawless world of colonialism and gunboat diplomacy"

 

   

The ruling class of the United States, severed from a fact-based universe and blinded by idiocy, greed and hubris, has immolated the internal mechanisms that prevent dictatorship, and the external mechanisms designed to protect against a lawless world of colonialism and gunboat diplomacy.     

Our democratic institutions are moribund. They are unable or unwilling to restrain our ruling gangster class. The lobby-infested Congress is a useless appendage. It surrendered its Constitutional authority, including the right to declare war and pass legislation, long ago. It sent a paltry 38 bills to Donald Trump’s desk to be signed into law last year. 

Most were “disapproval” resolutions rolling back regulations enacted during the Biden administration. Trump governs by imperial decree through Executive Orders. The media, owned by corporations and oligarchs, from Jeff Bezos to Larry Ellison, is an echo chamber for the crimes of state, including the ongoing genocide of Palestinians, attacks on Iran, Yemen and Venezuela, and the pillage by the billionaire class. Our money-saturated elections are a burlesque. 

The diplomatic corps, tasked with negotiating treaties and agreements, preventing war and building alliances, has been dismantled. The courts, despite some rulings by courageous judges, including blocking National Guard deployments to Los Angeles, Portland and Chicago, are lackeys to corporate power and overseen by a Department of Justice whose primary function is silencing Trump’s political enemies.

The corporate-indentured Democratic Party, our purported opposition, blocks the only mechanism that can save us — popular mass movements and strikes — knowing its corrupt and despised party leadership will be swept aside. Democratic Party leaders treat New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani — a flicker of light in the darkness — as if he has leprosy. Better to let the whole ship go down than surrender their status and privilege.

Dictatorships are one-dimensional. They reduce politics to its simplest form: Do what I say or I will destroy you. Nuance, complexity, compromise, and of course empathy and understanding, are beyond the tiny emotional bandwidth of gangsters, including the Gangster-in-Chief.

Dictatorships are a thug’s paradise. Gangsters, whether on Wall Street, Silicon Valley or in the White House, cannibalize their own country and pillage the natural resources of other countries. Dictatorships invert the social order. Honesty, hard work, compassion, solidarity, self-sacrifice are negative qualities. Those who embody these qualities are marginalized and persecuted. The heartless, corrupt, mendacious, cruel and mediocre thrive.

Dictatorships empower goons to keep their victims — at home and abroad — immobilized. Goons from the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Goons from Delta Force, Navy Seals and Black Ops CIA teams, which as any Iraqi or Afghan can tell you are the most lethal death squads on the planet. Goons from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) — seen escorting a hand-cuffed President Nicolás Maduro in New York — the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and police departments.

Can anyone seriously make the argument that the U.S. is a democracy? Are there any democratic institutions that function? Is there any check on state power? Is there any mechanism that can enforce the rule of law at home, where legal residents are snatched by masked thugs from our streets, where a phantom “radical left” is an excuse to criminalize dissent, where the highest court in the land bestows king-like power and immunity on Trump? 

Can anyone pretend that with the demolition of environmental agencies and laws — which should help us confront the looming ecocide, the gravest threat to human existence — there is any concern for the common good? Can anyone make the argument that the U.S. is the defender of human rights, democracy, a rule-based order and the “virtues” of Western civilization?

Our reigning gangsters will accelerate the decline. They will steal as much as they can, as fast as they can, on the way down. The Trump family has pocketed more than $1.8 billion in cash and gifts since the 2024 re-election. They do so as they mock the rule of law and tighten their vice-like grip. The walls are closing in. Free speech is abolished on college campuses and the airwaves. Those who decry the genocide lose their jobs or are deported. 

Journalists are slandered and censored. ICE, powered by Palantir — with a budget of $170 billion over four years — is laying the foundations for a police state. It has expanded the number of its agents by 120 percent. It is building a nationwide complex of detention centers. Not solely for the undocumented. But for us. Those outside the gates of the empire will fare no better with a $1 trillion budget for the war machine.

And this brings me to Venezuela where a head of state and his wife, Cilia Flores, were kidnapped and spirited to New York in open violation of international law and the U.N. Charter. We have not declared war on Venezuela, but then there was no declared war when we bombed Iran and Yemen. Congress did not approve the kidnapping and bombing of military facilities in Caracas because Congress was not informed.

The Trump administration dressed up the crime — which took the lives of 80 people — as a drug raid and, most bizarrely, as a violation of U.S. firearms statutes: “possession of machine guns and destructive devices; and conspiracy to possess machine guns and destructive devices.”

These charges are as absurd as attempting to legitimize the genocide in Gaza as Israel’s “right to defend itself.” If this was about drugs, former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernández would not have been pardoned by Trump last month, after he was sentenced to 45 years in prison for conspiring to distribute over 400 tons of cocaine in the U.S., a conviction that was justified with far greater evidence than that which supports the charges levied against Maduro.

But drugs are the pretext. Flush with success, there is already talk by Trump and his officials about IranCubaGreenland and perhaps ColombiaMexico and Canada. Absolute power at home and absolute power abroad expands. It feeds off of each lawless act. It snowballs into totalitarianism and disastrous military adventurism. By the time people realize what has happened, it is too late.

Who will rule Venezuela? Who will rule Gaza? Does it matter?

If nations and people do not bow before the great Moloch in Washington, they are bombed. This is not about establishing legitimate rule. It is not about fair elections. It is about using the threat of death and destruction to procure total subservience.

Trump made this clear when he warned interim Venezuelan President Delcy Rodríguez that “if she doesn’t do what’s right, she is going to pay a very big price, probably bigger than Maduro.” Maduro’s kidnapping was not carried out because of drug trafficking or possession of machine guns. This is about oil. It is, as Trump said, so the U.S. can “run” Venezuela.

“We’re going to have our very large United States oil companies, the biggest anywhere in the world, go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure, the oil infrastructure, and start making money for the country,” Trump said during a press conference Saturday.

Iraqis, a million of whom were killed during the U.S. war and occupation, know what comes next. The infrastructure, modern and efficient under Saddam Hussein — I reported from Iraq under Hussein so can attest to this truth — was destroyed. The Iraqi puppets installed by the U.S. had no interest in governance and reportedly stole some $150 billion in oil revenues.

The U.S., in the end, was booted out of Iraq, although controls Iraqi oil revenues which are funneled to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The government in Baghdad is allied with Iran. Its military includes Iran-backed militias in Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces. Iraq’s largest trading partners are China, the UAE, India and Turkey.

The debacles in Afghanistan and Iraq, which cost the American public anywhere from $4 to $6 trillion, were the most expensive in U.S. history. None of the architects of these fiascos have been held to account.

Countries singled out for “regime change” implode, as in Haiti, where the U.S., Canada and France overthrew Jean-Bertrand Aristide in 1991 and 2004. The overthrow ushered in societal and government collapse, gang warfare and exacerbated poverty. The same happened in Honduras when a 2009 U.S-backed coup removed Manuel Zelaya. 

The recently pardoned Hernández became president in 2014 and transformed Honduras into a narco-state, as did U.S. puppet Hamid Karzai in Afghanistan, who oversaw the production of 90 percent of the world’s heroin. And then there is Libya, another country with vast oil reserves. When Muammar Gaddafi was overthrown by NATO during the Obama administration in 2011, Libya splintered into enclaves led by rival warlords and militias.

The list of disastrous attempts by the U.S. at “regime change” is exhaustive, including in Kosovo, Syria, Ukraine and Yemen. All are examples of the folly of imperial overreach. All predict where we are headed.

The U.S. has targeted Venezuela since the 1998 election of Hugo Chavez. It was behind a failed coup in 2002. It imposed punishing sanctions over two decades. It tried to anoint opposition politician Juan Guaidó, as “interim president” although he was never elected to the presidency. When this did not work, Guaidó was dumped as callously as Trump abandoned opposition figure and Nobel Peace Prize laureate María Corina Machado. In 2020, we staged a Keystone Cops attempt by ill-trained mercenaries to trigger a popular uprising. None of it worked.

The kidnapping of Maduro begins another debacle. Trump and his minions are no more competent, and probably less so than officials from previous administrations, who tried to bend the world to their will. 

Our decaying empire stumbles forward like a wounded beast, unable to learn from its disasters, crippled by arrogance and incompetence, torching the rule of law and fantasizing that indiscriminate industrial violence will regain a lost hegemony. Able to project devastating military force, its initial success lead inevitably to self-defeating and costly quagmires. The tragedy is not that the American empire is dying, it is that it is taking down so many innocents with it.

The Chris Hedges Report is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.


Trump adviser testimony claims Russia offered to "swap" Venezuela for Ukraine in 2019

 


During U.S. President Donald Trump's first term, Russian officials signaled they would be willing to let Washington pursue its interests freely in Venezuela if the U.S. let Moscow do the same in Ukraine, former Trump adviser Fiona Hill said in a 2019 congressional hearing. 

Hill's comments have gained widespread attention in the aftermath of Trump's Jan. 3 attack on Venezuela and capture of dictator Nicolas Maduro, a Kremlin ally.

Years before the Venezuela attack, and before the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the Kremlin in April 2019 floated the possibility of giving up its influence in Venezuela for unimpeded control of Ukraine, according to Hill, then a senior adviser to Trump.

Russian officials "were signaling very strongly that they wanted to somehow make some very strange swap arrangement between Venezuela and Ukraine," Hill told lawmakers during a hearing in November 2019.

Moscow's overtures were "informal," Hill said, but the message was clear: "You know, you have your Monroe Doctrine. You want us out of your backyard. Well, you know, we have our own version of this. You're in our backyard in Ukraine."

Hill said she was sent to Russia to reject the proposal. However, seven years later, Trump invoked the Monroe Doctrine — an assertion that the U.S. has the right to economic domination of the Western Hemisphere — to justify his attack on Venezuela and the U.S. takeover of the country's oil industry.

Trump has claimed that the U.S. will now "run" Venezuela and commandeer its oil assets. Trump then announced on Jan. 6 that Venezuela would hand over up to 50 million barrels of sanctioned oil to the U.S.

"This oil will be sold at its market price, and that money will be controlled by me," Trump wrote on social media.

Trump has also demanded that Venezuela expel Russia, China, Iran, and Cuba, cutting economic ties with these nations before being allowed to pump more oil, according to sources who spoke to ABC News.


The White House has not responded to the Kyiv Independent's request for comment on these reports. Russian President Vladimir Putin has not commented on the U.S. attack on Venezuela, though the Russian Foreign Ministry issued a statement to the United Nations condemning U.S. aggression. Still, Moscow has done little to materially aid Venezuela in the wake of Maduro's capture. Analysts have pointed out that Putin might be willing to exchange his influence in Latin America for the ability to expand his ambitions in Europe.

Abbey Fenbert, Senior News Editor

Abbey Fenbert is a senior news editor at the Kyiv Independent. She is a freelance writer, editor, and playwright with an MFA from Boston University. Abbey served as a Peace Corps Volunteer in Ukraine from 2008-2011.

 

Tuesday, January 6, 2026

Do you remember Jacob Chansley?


Trump pardoned or commuted the sentences of all the Jan. 6 criminals on his first day back in office. He set loose a crew of seditionists, violent felons, moral reprobates, and menaces to society — or as he has called them, “great patriots” who participated in a “day of love.”

The pardons were an affront to law and order — as well as to public safety. Dozens have been arrested on new criminal offenses, including at least six who have been charged with child sex crimes... 

Jacob Chansley's Role on January 6th

Breached the Senate floor dressed as the QAnon Shaman, replete with a spear, red-white-and-blue war paint, and a fur cap with bison horns.

Conviction

Chansley pleaded guilty to a felony count of obstructing an official proceeding, after a stint in jail where he made news for refusing to eat anything but organic food.

Sentenced 

41 months in prison.

Last seen

In September Chansley filed an unhinged, $40 trillion lawsuit against Donald Trump in which he declared himself “the first legal President of the New Constitutional Republic of the United States” ordered the printing of a $40 trillion coin, of which he ordered $1 trillion given to himself “for my years' worth of pain, and suffering.” (He ordered another $1 trillion to be dedicated to “creating a new civilization based on symbiosis between humanity and nature.”)...

J6ers: Where Are They Now? - by Tim Dickinson


No Wars! No Kings! Congress Must Act!

 


The Trump regime's weekend attack on Venezuela, taking of President Maduro, and declaration that the US will "run" that country until some indeterminate date in the future was wildly irresponsible, wholly immoral, and can only lead to disaster, unless Congress acts.

No one voted for another war. No one voted for an authoritarian regime that puts service members and the American public at risk. No one voted for placing the oil wealth of a few oligarchs above international law, the Constitution, and common sense. No one voted for a king. 

As Indivisible co-founder Leah Greenberg said in a statement on Saturday: The power to declare war belongs to Congress and the American people. Trump has once again taken power that's not his. He is attempting to drag the country into war by decree, all while treating the presidency like a throne. Congress must act immediately to stop these illegal strikes and hold the Trump regime accountable. No Kings, No War.

The regime's been telegraphing the weekend's actions since Hegseth’s “Department of War” first launched strikes on boats in the Pacific and Caribbean last fall, then moved on to attacking and seizing Venezuelan oil tankers. The excuses have been paper thin and fluid, one day focused on a supposed "invasion" by Venezuelan gang members, the next on Fentanyl trafficking (despite expert opinion the Venezuela plays virtually no role in Fentanyl trafficking into the US), and over the weekend, concern for the Venezuelan economy. 

But Trump gave the game away by mentioning oil 25 times at Saturday's Mar-a-Lago press conference. This is about Venezuelan oil, billionaire corruption, and Trump's aspirations to be America's first dictator, even as he and the GOP ignore skyrocketing healthcare costs and unaffordable grocery bills here at home. We can't let him succeed. 

WHAT YOU CAN DO: We need to make it crystal clear to Congress: This lawless violence must stop.

First: Use our scripts and call tools to place a call to your Members of Congress. Trump must not be allowed to drag the country into yet more chaos. Saturday's military operation may be over, but Trump is talking about keeping US forces on the ground in Venezuela indefinitely, and explicitly threatening other countries in Latin America. Click here to call your senators, and click here to call your representative.

Next: Use our email tool to drive the point home. Click here to email your Members of Congress to demand an end to military action against Venezuela.

Then: Register for the Healthcare Not Warfare grassroots call we're hosting with MoveOn, the Working Families Party, Win Without War, and Public Citizen, this Wednesday, January 7, at 8pm ET/ 5pm PT. We'll be joined by Rep. Ilhan Omar and Rep. Greg Casar and other leaders in the fight against fascism and want to be sure you're there with us. None of us is alone; the more we work together, the stronger we'll be. Trump wants to be a wartime king. We the people demand: No War, No Kings.

In solidarity,
Indivisible Team

“Congress must do the right thing by voting to stop this obvious catastrophe"

 


President Donald Trump’s invasion of Venezuela is generating fresh calls for his impeachment and removal from office. Shortly after the US military bombed the Venezuelan capital of Caracas and abducted Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, many experts on international law argued that the president’s actions were completely illegal.

In an interview with the New Yorker’s Isaac Chotiner, Yale Law School professor Oona Hathaway said that she didn’t believe there “is a legal basis for what we’re seeing in Venezuela,” while adding that the arguments the Trump administration will likely make simply “don’t hold water.”

For instance, Hathaway noted that while the United Nations charter allows nations to use military force in self-defense against military aggression, the administration’s claims that attacking Maduro was a defensive measure intended to stop the flow of illegal drugs into the US was completely outside the scope of traditional self-defense.

“If drug trafficking is a reasonable justification, then a whole range of possible arguments can be made that basically mean that self-defense is no longer a real exception,” she argued. “It’s the new rule. Why couldn’t you make the same argument about communicable diseases? There’s bird flu coming from a country, and therefore we have a legal justification for the use of military force. Once we start going down that road, the idea that there’s any limit evaporates.”

Hathaway also said that Trump’s militaristic ambitions seem to have grown throughout his second term, and she warned they could lead to a long and bloody US military occupation of Venezuela.

“In his press conference, Trump said that the United States would ‘run the country,’” she said. “And he made it clear that he was not ‘afraid’ to put boots on the ground—for years, if necessary... it’s nothing like anything Trump has done before today. His previous illegal uses of force were all over shortly after they began. The scale of the operation that will be required is massive, and it means putting US soldiers at long-term risk.”

Harvard Law School professor Jack Goldsmith wrote a lengthy analysis after the attack on Venezuela and also concluded that it violated the UN charter. What’s more, Goldsmith argued that Trump’s state plan to seize Venezuela’s oil would likely run afoul of the Fourth Geneva Convention, which limits actions that occupying powers can take on the countries they are overseeing.

“There are a lot of international law rules and restrictions that purport to govern what the United States can do as an occupying power,” he explained. “I don’t have space here to review them but suffice it to say that these rules will touch on President Trump’s stated aim of ‘tak[ing] back the oil’ and ‘get[ting] reimbursed.’ We will see if the administration takes these rules seriously.”

Many Trump critics also argued that, legality aside, toppling a foreign head of state and vowing to seize their nation’s natural resources was morally wrong and deserving of impeachment.

“This is the behavior of a mob boss—but with nuclear weapons and the world’s strongest military,” argued Zeteo editor-in-chief Medhi Hassan. “None of this is legal. Trump should be impeached by Congress and indicted at The Hague.”

Leah Greenberg, co-founder and co-executive director of Indivisible, denounced Trump’s attack on Venezuela as “wildly illegal, immoral, and irresponsible,” and urged the US Congress to exercise its powers to stop the president from further escalation.

“The power to declare war belongs to Congress and the American people,” Greenberg said. “Trump has once again taken power that’s not his. He is attempting to drag the country into war by decree, all while treating the presidency like a throne. Congress must act immediately to stop these illegal strikes and hold the Trump regime accountable. No Kings, No War.”

Cavan Kharrazian, senior policy adviser for Demand Progress, demanded congressional action to “stop this reckless, unconstitutional act of war.” “We have seen what happens when the White House invents a pretext to launch a regime change war with an oil-rich nation: disaster and suffering for innocent civilians, our troops and their families, all while costing the American taxpayer a fortune as well,” said Kharrazian. “Congress must do the right thing by voting to stop this obvious catastrophe.”

Kat Abughazaleh, a Democratic candidate for US Congress in Illinois, wrote on Bluesky that the time for Democratic politicians to issue mealy-mouthed statements about Trump’s actions was over. “Democrats need to grow a fucking spine,” she wrote. “No more strongly worded letters. It’s time to draft articles of impeachment. Impeach. Convict. Remove.”

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) also demanded that members of his party take a strong stance against Trump’s illegal Venezuela attack. “The silence from many media-hyped 2028 contenders today is shocking,” he wrote on X. “If you cannot oppose this regime change war for oil, you don’t have the moral clarity or guts to lead our party or nation.”

-Brad Reed, Common Dreams


Monday, January 5, 2026

If we had a functional Constitution, we wouldn’t have an illegal war

Donald Trump’s unprovoked and unconstitutional war against Venezuela demolished any notion that we live in a rules-based, constitutional democracy. If the Constitution—which explicitly grants Congress the exclusive power to declare war—were operative, lawmakers would have been briefed before the operation, robust debate would have ensued, and Congress would have voted (or not) to go to war.

Instead, without legal justification, Trump blithely killed scores of civilians on boats, launched an illegal war on Venezuela (killing more civilians), kidnapped its president, and declared he wants to take its oil and “run” a sovereign country. (Aside from its constitutional defects, an unprovoked war to extract oil is a moral disgrace, depriving us of moral standing to contest others’ nations’ wars of aggression.)

While egregious, this is not an isolated assault on the rule of law. Under Trump’s regime, the Constitution has begun to resemble Swiss cheese, or perhaps the redacted Epstein files—displaying more blacked out sections than text. The sections in Article I that establish Congress’s powers have all but been eliminated. In the words of Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi, MAGA Republicans “have abolished the Congress.” She accurately observed, “They just do what the president insists that they do.”

Specifically, MAGA lackeys in Congress have allowed Trump to abscond with, among other things, the powers to declare war and make rules regulating the military (e.g., allowing Trump to violate the prohibition on murder of shipwrecked civilians), enact tariffs, establish uniform rules of naturalization (Trump now claims the power to “de-naturalize” enemies), and coin money (no pennies!). Trump’s stooges have also ceded the power to appropriate money from the Treasury (by condoning rescission), and to legislate for the District of Columbia (making a mockery of home rule).

The MAGA Senate gave away its power to confirm “officers of the United States” (e.g., U.S. attorneys), leaving it up to litigants such as James Comey and Letitia James to defend the Senate’s advice and consent role. As for Cabinet officials, MAGA senators have refused to render independent judgment on nominees they know to be unfit, including Pam Bondi, RFK, Jr., and Pete Hegseth. (In acquitting Trump for the insurrection that he staged 5 years ago, MAGA senators put a stake through the heart of the impeachment power.)

The erasure of the Framers’ handiwork does not stop there. The president’s Article II obligation to faithfully execute the law has been deleted as he repeatedly ignores court orders and now contemptuously rejects the notion that our obligations under the United Nations are binding on the U.S. He runs roughshod over First Amendment protections for speech, press, and association, and has attempted to brush aside the 14th Amendment (affirming birthright citizenship and disqualifying insurrectionists from federal office).

Certainly, the overthrow of our constitutional order could have been stopped by minimally responsible House and Senate Republican majorities. But we cannot ignore the Supreme Court’s responsibility for wrecking the Constitution.

Despite Chief Justice John Roberts’s preposterous ode to the “rule of law” in his year-end report, he and fellow partisan hacks on the Supreme Court have made mincemeat of the Constitution. (In declaring our founding documents to be “firm and unshaken,” he reminds us that “hypocrisy is the compliment vice pays to virtue.”) Roberts’ 2024 majority opinion, devoid of textual or historical legitimacy, granted Trump immunity for virtually all crimes while in office, thereby ushering in his return to office, unprecedented executive overreach, reign of domestic terror, and now an unconstitutional and shameful war for oil. No chief justice has done more to destroy the “rule of law” than Roberts.

Since Trump’s return, Roberts and the other robed-MAGA functionaries have continued to hack away at Article I by bestowing on Trump unilateral power to destroy congressionally enacted departments and override statues (which, for example, establish independent regulatory bodies and mandate spending). Arrogantly disregarding the need for briefing or explanation, the MAGA justices summarily have overturned numerous decisions of lower courts to greenlight Trump’s executive overreach.

It would be useful if members and judges such as Roberts aligning themselves with the “Federalist Society” would actually read the Federalist Papers, which cautioned about the very outcome Trump achieved. “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny,” James Madison warned in Federalist No. 47. Madison’s notion that “the preservation of liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct” now sounds quaint, archaic and foreign.

Before the 2024 election, Protect Democracy warned:

Authoritarian projects cannot succeed without the cooperation or acquiescence of legislatures, courts, and other institutions designed to provide checks and balances. In some cases, authoritarians explicitly rewrite the rules to strengthen executive power and weaken legislatures, while in others they simply stack these competing institutions with lackeys and compliant allies or engage in “constitutional hardball” by manipulating existing loopholes or pushing boundaries of existing laws. Authoritarians also often justify the expansion of executive power with cults of personality and aggrandizement of the trappings of office, while denigrating checks and balances as corrupt obstacles to the popular will.

Put differently, the “Constitution” as drafted and amended over more than two centuries is unrecognizable, and concepts such as “rule of law,” “separations of powers,” and “checks and balances” have become meaningless platitudes. We are left with a wholesale obliteration of checks and balance, which in turn resulted in an illegal war with uncertain consequences.

However, while Trump and his MAGA acolytes certainly have made considerable headway in destroying the exoskeleton of our democracy (a written constitution in which power is divided to thwart tyranny), done incalculable damage to our democracy, ruined countless lives (e.g., fired civil servants, deported hard-working immigrants), endangered our troops, and destroyed our moral standing in the world, we should not conclude the Constitution is gone for good.

We can begin to restore constitutional order with sustained, robust, and peaceful protest to educate the public and hold Republicans responsible for serial outrages. Democrats should be encouraged to use every device to stop the slide into fascism and focus on Trump’s multiple outrages and broken promises. (Prices are up, corruption is at unprecedented levels, and a new illegitimate war is underway.)

With that predicate, Democrats then must run up the score in the midterms, the essential mechanism to halt further constitutional vandalism and set the predicate for democracy’s revival. The latter will require curtailing president powers through elections, legislation, constitutional amendment, and/or judicial decisions; electing a Congress that fulfills its constitutional obligations; and reforming an anti-constitutional Supreme Court by limiting justices’ terms, expanding the court, and shrinking its appellate jurisdiction.

In sum, we must be honest about the constitutional wreckage, the culprits responsible, and the work that we must undertake. If Americans rise to the occasion, they can deliver an historic rebuke to scads of Republicans, allowing the hard work of repair to begin. Our failure to do so would spell catastrophe for democratic recovery.

The Contrarian is reader-supported. To receive new posts, enable our work, help with litigation efforts, and keep this opposition movement alive and engaged through 2026, please consider joining the fight as a paid subscriber.

 

Sunday, January 4, 2026

"The Next Step in the United States' Campaign of Regime Change"

 


US President Donald Trump and top administration officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, characterized Saturday’s assault on Venezuela and abduction of the country’s president as a warning shot in the direction of Cuba, Mexico, Colombia, and other Latin American nations.

During a Saturday press conference, Trump openly invoked the Monroe Doctrine—an assertion of US dominance of the Western Hemisphere—and said his campaign of aggression against Venezuela represented the “Monroe Doctrine” in action.

In his unwieldy remarks, Trump called out Colombian President Gustavo Petro by name, accusing him without evidence of “making cocaine and sending it to the United States.”

“So, he does have to watch his ass,” the US president said of Petro, who condemned the Trump administration’s Saturday attack on Venezuela as “aggression against the sovereignty of Venezuela and Latin America.”

Petro responded defiantly to the possibility of the US targeting him, writing on social media that he is “not worried at all.”

In a Fox News appearance earlier Saturday, Trump also took aim at the United States’ southern neighbor, declaring ominously that “something’s going to have to be done with Mexico,” which also denounced the attack on Venezuela and abduction of President Nicolás Maduro.

“She is very frightened of the cartels,” Trump said of Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. “So, we have to do something.”

“This armed attack on Venezuela is not an isolated event. It is the next step in the United States’ campaign of regime change that stretches from Caracas to Havana.”

Rubio, for his part, focused on Cuba—a country whose government he has long sought to topple. “If I lived in Havana and I was in the government, I’d be concerned, at least a little bit,” Rubio, who was born in Miami to Cuban immigrant parents, said during Saturday’s press conference.

That the Trump administration wasted no time threatening other nations as it pledged to control Venezuela indefinitely sparked grave warnings, with the leadership of Progressive International cautioning that “this armed attack on Venezuela is not an isolated event.”

“It is the next step in the United States’ campaign of regime change that stretches from Caracas to Havana—and an attack on the very principle of sovereign equality and the prospects for the Zone of Peace once established by the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States,” the coalition said in a statement. “This renewed declaration of impunity from Washington is a threat to all nations around the world.”

“Trump has clearly articulated the imperial logic of this intervention—to seize control over Venezuela’s natural resources and reassert US domination over the hemisphere,” said Progressive International. “The ‘Trump corollary’ to the Monroe Doctrine—applied in recent hours with violent force over the skies of Caracas—is the single greatest threat to peace and prosperity that the Americas confront today.”

-Jake Johnson, Common Dreams